Romans 1 and homosexuality is a real hot button topic in today's argumentative culture. These ancient ruins are all that remain today of the pagan temples (including the temple of Cybele), public buildings and private palaces which dotted the Palatine Hill in first century Rome.
the ancient Middle Eastern fertility goddess, referred to by the Romans as the Mother of the gods.
Is homosexuality the focal point of Paul's argument in Romans 1? The common sense answer is No.
Many Christians assume things about homosexuality and the Bible which are simply not true. Did you know that none of the 48 references to Sodom in the Bible mention homosexuality in the context? Isn't that interesting?
If God intended us to believe that Sodom is all about condemning homosexuality, why didn't God mention homosexuality when He mentions Sodom?
The Romans 1 and homosexuality argument wrongly reads modern views into a first century document. But you can get the truth here.
Aphrodite was another fertility goddess worshiped by the ancient Romans. She was the Greek and Roman version of Ashtoreth, the Canaanite fertility goddess.
No reference to Sodom in the OT mentions homosexuality or lesbianism.
The argument about Romans 1 generally goes this way. Since God denounces homosexuality in the Old Testament, Paul is simply restating the commonly accepted Old Testament view that homosexuality and lesbianism are bad, very bad.
The problem is that no reference to Sodom in the OT mentions homosexuality. And lesbianism is never mentioned or condemned in the Old Testament.
Same sex rape and shrine prostitution are condemned in the OT but nowhere does scripture condemn committed, faithful homosexual partnerships as we know them today.
Therefore, to assume that Paul is talking about homosexuality in Romans 1, when homosexuality is not the issue, is a theological dead end.
Scripture cannot mean NOW what it did not mean THEN
So there is no misunderstanding, as in the Old Testament, all ten New Testament references to Sodom neglect to mention homosexuality.
Either God forgot to mention homosexuality when He mentioned Sodom or some modern Christians have got this issue all wrong. We know God is not forgetful so we must conclude that some modern Christians are simply wrong when they base their condemnation of homosexuality on the Bible.
Romans 1 and homosexuality? In the opening chapter of Romans, Paul reminds his readers about Gentile idolatry and the shrine prostitution which accompanied it. Paul does not mention homosexuals and he does not mention lesbians. Paul’s purpose in Romans 1 is to show that everyone, Jew or Gentile, is equally guilty before a holy God. Romans 1 and homosexuality? Romans 1 is not an argument against homosexuality.
and Protectress of ancient Rome, in her chariot pulled by lions. This particular fountain is in Spain.
Idolatry, not homosexuality and not lesbianism, is the pivot point of Paul’s argument in Romans 1. When discussing Romans 1 and homosexuality, we must be absolutely honest about the text.
Paul Talks About Gentile Idolatry In Romans 1, Not Homosexuals And Not Lesbians
For this cause [idolatry] God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
Idolatry is the hook that catches Gentiles and Jews and allows Paul to declare everyone guilty before a holy God, Romans 3:23.
Paul heard Stephen preach against the Molech idol in Acts 7:43 and it stuck in his mind.
Years later, when Paul writes Romans, he has in mind fertility goddess worship, which in the Old Testament, is addressed under the rubric of Molech worship. Paul does not name Molech in particular because first century Romans worshipped multiple fertility goddesses, Cybele and Aphrodite, for example.
The Apostle Paul was present to hear Stephen's sermon against Molech worship and watched him die a martyr's death.
Stephen's sermon in Acts 7, in which he mentioned Israel's wicked worship of Molech, made a deep impression on Paul,
who got saved, Acts 9, within a few months of Stephen's martyrdom. When Paul writes Romans 1, he even repeats Stephen's phrase about "God giving them up."
Romans 1 and homosexuality?
No. Paul's words in Romans 1:26-27 better fit the context of Paul’s experience of hearing Stephen preach against idolatry and Molech, Acts 7:43. That context plus the intertextual echoes from Old Testament passages, link the idolatry of Romans 1 to the shrine prostitution of first century Rome, not to homosexuality.
Gay Christian 101 - Spiritual Self-Defense For Gay Christians. goes into more detail on this topic. Romans 1 and homosexuality is a false correlation which is not supported by the historical context or the Biblical context.
“Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.” - Romans 1:19
God revealed Himself to the Gentiles through their conscience. Long before He gave the Law on Mt. Sinai, God’s law was:
“written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts... accusing or... excusing one another.” - Romans 2:15
The human race is without excuse because God revealed Himself to us through:
“Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,” - Romans 1:21-22
As the Gentiles reject the truth God showed them, God begins to reject the Gentiles.
The Law of Cause and Effect
Paul lists three causes,
which produce three effects.
Now think about that for a moment. Romans 1 is clear. God gave them up because of idolatry, not because of homosexuality or lesbianism.
The same sex practices Paul mentions were shrine prostitution in worship of the fertility goddess. The most prominent fertility goddess in first century Rome was Cybele, who had five temples in her honor at the time Paul wrote his Epistle to the Romans. Cybele as Mater Deum, Mother of the gods, was also honored on Roman coins.
The stoning of Stephen.
When Paul frames his argument about Gentile idolatry, he has in mind Stephen's words in Acts 7.
Paul Lists Three Exchanges Of Truth For Error
Romans 1 and homosexuality? No. Paul carefully lists three causes linked to idolatry (not homosexuality), in which the Gentiles exchange truth for error. Just as carefully, Paul lists three corresponding effects of idolatry, in which God gives up the Gentiles to their error.
Romans 1 and homosexuality? No. Many Christians believe, falsely, that Paul suddenly injected into his Romans letter, a universal condemnation of lesbianism and homosexuality in Romans 1:26-27, a condemnation unrelated to idolatry.
This attempt to link Romans 1 and homosexuality, downplays the context of idolatry and wrongly makes lesbianism and homosexuality the focus of Paul’s argument.
Cybele, a fertility goddess
whose temple atop the Palatine Hill loomed over ancient Rome, was worshiped by Romans in the first century AD, when Paul wrote his epistle to the Romans.
Romans 1 and homosexuality? The context of all three exchanges is idolatry, not homosexuality and not lesbianism.
Citing idolatry to differentiate between Gentiles and Jews was a common rhetorical device in the first century.
Romans 1 and homosexuality? No. In Romans 1, Paul's comments seem to echo the pseudepigraphal book Wisdom of Solomon, using a similar three part statement about Gentile idolatry. Wisdom of Solomon was a well-known book in the first century so it fits historically that Paul would allude to something with which his Roman readers were familiar.
Idolatry and shrine prostitution, not homosexuality and lesbianism, are primarily what Paul addressed in Romans 1.
Romans 1 and homosexuality? Paul grounds his Romans 1 argument in historical fact, describing what Christians witnessed every day in Rome, the idolatry and shrine prostitution which surrounded the worship of false gods.
Idolatry, not homosexuality and not lesbianism, is the specific context of Paul's argument in Romans 1.
Too many Christians read their own presuppositions into scripture and attempt to make the Bible say something it does not say.
The Romans 1 and homosexuality misinterpretation is a perfect example of that.
When read in historical context and in the context of Paul's life experience, we come to a very different conclusion. Romans 1 is talking about shrine prostitution in worship of the fertility goddess. Shrine prostitution was practiced in Rome in the first century.
Shrine prostitution is certainly how Paul's first century readers understood his words in Romans 1 and that is how we ought to understand Romans 1.
Helpful Links to additional information.
Those who believe that the Centurion’s pais was only a servant and not the same sex partner of the gay Centurion, cite Greek lexicons to prove their case. Since most Biblical Greek lexicons do not mention beloved or same sex lover as possible meanings of pais. most nongay Christians insist same sex lover could not possibly be the meaning of pais.
Family Values in the Bible are so different from Traditional family values as taught by Focus On The Family that modern Christians would totally reject the "family values" practiced by Abraham and Sarah, Ruth and Boaz and many of the heroes of faith in the Old Testament.
We are saved
FREE Bible Study
FREE Bible Study
Click the cross.